Frank Lloyd Wright

.. them and they found that they were fake, Wright was so embarrassed that he invited Mansfield to come to Taliesin II and pick some from Wrights own collection. In September 1923, Wright got a telegram telling him that Tokyo had its worst earthquake in history. He later got word that the Imperial Hotel was standing and was housing hundreds of homeless people, and the only thing that was wrong was that a few stone statues from the gardens had sunk into the ground. Wright had done it, he had constructed an earthquake proof structure.

Wright later started a school for apprentices where they taught not only the principles of architecture but also the principles of life. In the summer the school was in Wisconsin, at Taliesin II. In the winter, the school was in Arizona, in a house called Taliesin West. At Taliesin west there was a great room that could seat eighty people. The walls and ceilings were open and at night tarps were pulled down over them to keep out the cold.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

At both houses apprentices kept themselves busy by making minor repairs on the house, the studio or build new buildings. As well as farm work, house work and whatever else came along. They fixed broken pipes, and during the depression in the 1930s, they cut their own wood and quarried their own stone. They also grew their own produce that they stored in a root cellar for winter or times when food supply was short. At first the tuition was only six hundred dollars, which included room and board. After the first year though the tuition went up to around eight hundred dollars because the apprentices were fed well and they were supplied with all of the things they needed to build and design.

Wright believed that each apprentice should be able to express themselves, so he let each apprentice decorate their own room at the beginning of each year. Wright designed many buildings that were never built, some have even been built since his death. He died on April 9, 1959. Frank Lloyd Wright through the Eyes of Aylesa Forsee Aylesa Forsee writes mainly of Wrights life as an architect and only briefly mentions his private life, in the book Frank Lloyd Wright: A Rebel in Concrete . She writes of him laughing as his children laugh during the holidays, and him taking personal exile and leaving his first wife to go to Germany.

The last sentence of the book, reads Wrights genius will never die. She also never mentions any of his mistresses, whom I have found a lot of information about while doing other research. For these reasons I feel that she is lavish in her opinions of him, in other words biased towards him and his work as well as his beliefs. She makes him out to be a great man whose work should have been accepted and commended long before it was, when actually in the era that he lived the people were not looking for innovative new ideas that he was designing them. Also, Wright was designing houses that were too expensive for people during the depression causing him to resort to more conventional, inexpensive housing.

Some major successes that the author really highlights are the Imperial Hotel in Japan, Wrights job at Adler and Sullivan, the school that Wright started for young architects and the Solomon Guggenheim museum in New York City. Some major failures that the author writes about are Wrights failed marriages and houses that he designed but were never built. The author doesnt go into much detail about either of these topics. The author focuses mostly on Wrights major successes in life such as the Imperial Hotel, the Guggenheim Museum and the apprentice school that he started. A former teacher, Aylesa Forsee wrote Frank Lloyd Wright: A Rebel in Concrete because she wanted to challenge the minds of teenagers, and so that they would have a role model who followed his dreams. Interview Q Why did you want to be an architect? During my research I encountered many different stories of his life and I would like to know the real story. Q Why did you rebuild Taliesin II after the first had burned down, and with almost the same building designs? This has been bothering me since I first read the book.

If he lost so many people and things of sentimental value why would you rebuild something with almost the exact same design? Q What advice would you give to aspiring young artists? He was a stubborn man who was very determined in bringing about a revolution of architecture, I would really like to know what kept him going after all of the set backs. Q If you could do one thing differently what would it be? He did so many things that I would have regretted, maybe he would have been more or less lenient when designing a house, or built it more to the owners taste. Q The Wright Association is now selling blueprints of houses that you designed but were never built. The pottery-house was one of them, and the same blue print was sold twice. In this case what would you have done? Would have allowed both houses to be built or not and why? Many people at the association wondered what Wright would have done, they allowed both houses to be built because it was their mistake.

Q Why did you open the school in Wisconsin? It was controversial when Wright started the school because he wanted it recognized as an institution of learning and the American Architects Society refused to except the school as an institute of learning. Q Why did you build the main area of the Guggenheim Museum as a ramp, seeing that you design everything for practical use? When you go into the Guggenheim you take an elevator or escalator to the top and then you walk down the ramp. I chose to analyze Falling Water at Bull Run, Pennsylvania. Falling Water was built for Edgar Kauffman in 1935. Wright went to see the land before he designed the house.

He tied the house into the natural surroundings of the area using flat rock for the walls and textured cement. There are balconies over the waterfall to tie in the waterfall with the house. The furniture was designed by Wright to tie in the whole house which is a big open space centered around the fire place which has a huge river rock for a hearth. I chose to Analyze the Decaro house in Oak Park, Illinois. The Decaro house was a house that Wright built against his own reasoning. Afterwards he wished he hadnt built it in the first place because it didnt come from his heart. The house is built squarely like the Unity Temple also in Oak Park, Illinois. Like Wrights other work it was built for use and all extra ornamentation that had no purpose was left out.

Wright probably, as he did with other houses, designed the furniture and the china and even the clothes of the woman who owned it so that when entertaining she would blend in with the house. Both houses had an impact on society not really alone but if you put together all of Wrights work on the whole it was controversial and lots of people didnt like his style. Artists and European architects loved his work and worshipped him as a person, but many American architects were still building classical Greek and Roman accented houses. Wright was ahead of his time. Endnotes Biographies.